FFXIclopedia:AfD Discussions/Noble's Attire Set

Delete: Unnecessary redirect. --User:Charitwo/Sig 15:52, 16 June 2007 (CDT)

Keep: Attire Set to me, is more preferable over the Tunic Set. Noble's Tunic Set doesn't really make sense. Suggest a redirect from the other set. Noble's Tunic set suggests you are offered a gallery of different Noble's Tunics. -Cleric-yokiko 15:59, 16 June 2007 (CDT)

Comment: See FFXIclopedia:Naming Conventions#Armor Sets

Armor set naming conventions are broken up into two types; storable sets, and sets that are not storable. Storable armor sets should be named after the key item you recieve when storing the set. Example: Eisenplatte Armor Set (has the key item Eisenplatte armor claim slip). Non-storable sets should be named after the body piece of the set. Example: Bastokan Harness Set. If a storable set has a High Quality non-storable version, it can follow similar naming conventions as the storable set. Example: Kampfplatte Armor Set.

--User:Charitwo/Sig 16:05, 16 June 2007 (CDT)

• imo that needs to be changed. it is very misleading and not accurate whatsoever. it's not a set of Noble's Tunics, nor should a set be named after the suffix of a piece. It should always be named after the prefix, in this case, Noble's, since all pieces don the name Noble's, signifying it is that type of gear. i vote for a change of naming conventions regarding that. it seems rather ridiculous to have non-storable sets go by the body piece. -Cleric-yokiko 23:49, 16 June 2007 (CDT)

Good luck with that, lol. Not going to happen. --User:Charitwo/Sig 00:20, 17 June 2007 (CDT)

Resolution: Delete. Non-storable sets are named after the body piece for conformity. --◄Chrisjander► t/ c 11:15, 8 July 2007 (CDT)